tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post1486262777683479796..comments2023-10-24T04:29:23.693-06:00Comments on Atheist Ethicist: The "Smart" Democratic CandidateAlonzo Fyfehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-20334991434383563172007-11-14T11:45:00.000-07:002007-11-14T11:45:00.000-07:00eneaszActually, I would not. Neither organization ...<B>eneasz</B><BR/><BR/>Actually, I would not. Neither organization is focused on simply keeping candidates honest and their claims well defended.<BR/><BR/>For example: neither organization would (or did) interest itself in Representative Dana Rohrabacher's sophistry on global warming <A HREF="http://atheistethicist.blogspot.com/2007/02/sophistry-engineering-false-beliefs.html" REL="nofollow">Sophistry: Engineering False Beliefs</A><BR/><BR/>Or in <A HREF="http://atheistethicistjournal.blogspot.com/2007/11/war-cost-lies-from-congress.html" REL="nofollow">yesterday's Democratic misrepresentation</A> of the cost if the Iraq War.<BR/><BR/>The rationalist caucus would have much broader concerns than with an organization focused specifically on church-state issues.Alonzo Fyfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-61767673134423716322007-11-14T11:27:00.000-07:002007-11-14T11:27:00.000-07:00Would you consider either the Secular Coalition fo...Would you consider either the Secular Coalition for America (http://www.secular.org/) or Freedom From Religion Foundation (http://www.ffrf.org/) as fulfilling this function?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com