Atheist Ethicist

A view of right and wrong, good and evil, in a universe without gods.

Wednesday, January 09, 2019

British Ethical Theorists 0013: Roger Crisp's demon

›
If you are trying to defend desirism, and you come across somebody who has a good idea of what she is doing, she is going to summon Roger Cr...

British Ethical Theorists 0012: Ought to Desire

›
Introduction Desirism is concerned centrally with what an agent ought to desire. in fact, it says that this is the central question of mor...

British Ethical Theorists 0011: Admiration

›
There is a view in metaethics that holds that “X is good” is reducible in some way to “Agent(s) ought to have a positive attitude towards X”...
Tuesday, January 08, 2019

British Ethical Theorists 0010: Intrinsic Rightness

›
In Thomas Hurka's book British Ethical Theorists , Hurka has the British Ethical Theorists (BETs) presenting an impressive argument agai...

Metaethics 0002: C. L. Stevenson - Emotivism

›
In the beginning, I was told that "emotivism" is a non-cognitivist moral theory. This means that it does not allow for the possibi...
Monday, January 07, 2019

Metaethics 0001: A.J. Ayer - Non-Cognitivism

›
This series of posts will concern the topic of the second course I am taking this semester - Metaethics. The text we are using is Cahn, Stev...

British Ethical Theorists 0009: Acting for the Right Reasons

›
Thomas Hurka reported in his book British Ethical Theorists that the British Ethical Theorists (BETs) believed that rightness is independen...
Sunday, January 06, 2019

British Ethical Theorists 0008: The Ought vs. The Good

›
What is the relationship between what an agent ought to do and what is good? I have already reported on Thomas Hurka's thesis that the...
Friday, January 04, 2019

British Ethical Theorists 0007: Moral Language

›
If you have a moral theory that requires that a person get a PhD in philosophy and learn a technical moral language before they can decide w...

British Ethical Theorists 0006: Rights and Reasons

›
Thomas Hurka argued in his book, British Ethical Theorists , that they were conceptual minimalists. They did not like all of these evaluativ...
Thursday, January 03, 2019

British Ethical Theorists 0005: Practical Ought

›
I am looking at the ways in which the British Ethical Theorists (BETs) of 1850-1950 sought to eliminate all concepts of "ought" ex...

British Ethical Theorists 0004: Hypothetical and Categorical Ought

›
Thomas Hurka argued that the British Ethical Theorists (BETs) he discussed in his book British Ethical Theorists were conceptual minimalist...

British Ethical Theorists 0003: Thick Evaluative Concepts and the Is-Ought Gap

›
The previous post brought up the fact that the British Ethical Theorists currently under discussion all seemed to think that "thick eva...
‹
›
Home
View web version

About Me

My photo
Alonzo Fyfe
When I was in high school, I decided that I wanted to leave the world better off than it would have been if I had not existed. This started a quest, through 12 years of college and on to today, to try to discover what a "better" world consists of. I have written a book describing that journey that you can find on my website. In this blog, I will keep track of the issues I have confronted since then.
View my complete profile
Powered by Blogger.