tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post7669835319457621004..comments2023-10-24T04:29:23.693-06:00Comments on Atheist Ethicist: Kirk Cameron and Preaching Hate on CampusAlonzo Fyfehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comBlogger6125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-6428541756365370542009-10-02T07:42:29.080-06:002009-10-02T07:42:29.080-06:00I'm not really much of a fan of banning anybod...I'm not really much of a fan of banning anybody from campus.<br /><br />I would rather see them on campus with a vocal demonstration against the hate-mongering bigotry contained in their effort to blame atheists for the Holocaust.<br /><br />I think society is better off with a useful lesson against this type of immorality (with examples to point to and say, "Do not be like them - they are not good people") than by forced silenceAlonzo Fyfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-24763493559771434522009-10-02T06:50:53.988-06:002009-10-02T06:50:53.988-06:00So students will learn evolution from real scienti...So students will learn evolution from real scientists with PhD. Yet their gonna believe two closet homosexuals handing out propaganda on campus. I dont think so. Whats bein done to ban these idiots from stepping on to campuses.Jarradnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-29264663959465651252009-09-28T05:28:36.379-06:002009-09-28T05:28:36.379-06:00artificial and natural selection the same way that...artificial and natural selection the same way that one can differentiate between artificial and natural sweateners - by whether there is human involvement.<br /><br />However one wants to make the distinction, Darwin did not invent artificial selection. Humans had known about it for thousands of years. So, blaming Darwin for the Holocaust is still the act of a person who seeks to make a living (or to make a life) selling hate.Alonzo Fyfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-16245677811354920292009-09-27T14:59:55.906-06:002009-09-27T14:59:55.906-06:00That's a good point, technically all selection...That's a good point, technically all selection is "natural", since humans are a part of nature. However that would also mean that we'd have to get rid of the word artificial completely. We couldn't have artificial rocks, or sweetners, or waterfalls, etc etc. Because technically everything is part of nature or made by natural beings (humans).<br /><br />I think the whole point of the word "artificial" is to draw a line between "that which is created by humans" and "everything else". So in this case it very clearly IS artificial selection.Eneaszhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14500232958398471146noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-57652750338330642052009-09-27T00:50:02.787-06:002009-09-27T00:50:02.787-06:00I wonder how one can differentiate between artific...I wonder how one can differentiate between artificial and natural selection? Seems like a handy contortion. If the laws of nature are universally applicable, they should apply to human behavior just a surely they apply to other interactions of matter and energy.buyinghouse@live.comnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-9208699620270313322009-09-25T18:55:31.339-06:002009-09-25T18:55:31.339-06:00I wonder what Cameron and Comfort think about Gene...I wonder what Cameron and Comfort think about Genesis 30:31-43, where, as the story goes, Jacob did how own bit of "eugenics" with goats?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com