tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post115033933427668296..comments2023-10-24T04:29:23.693-06:00Comments on Atheist Ethicist: Rational Choice and Catestrophic PossibilitiesAlonzo Fyfehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-1150667626347789022006-06-18T15:53:00.000-06:002006-06-18T15:53:00.000-06:00I saw this column in my local paper. It's against ...I saw this column in my local paper. It's against the Al Gore movie<BR/>(Saudners has also written against evolution in the past).<BR/><BR/>After calming down, I tried to figure out what she was actually saying,<BR/>and I think this is it:<BR/><BR/>She says that Al Gore said EVERY scientist supports the theory of global<BR/>warming. But she lists three scientists who disagree with him;<BR/>therefore, Al is lying; it's proof that Al is not interested purely in<BR/>facts, but about his personal crusade. And anyone on a crusade should be<BR/>approached with a healthy dose of skepticism.<BR/><BR/>If that's her argument, it's pretty weak. But I have to admit, I wasn't entirely sure what her point was, if she indeed had a single point to make.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com