tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post113081403583431361..comments2023-10-24T04:29:23.693-06:00Comments on Atheist Ethicist: Wal-Mart: Image vs. SubstanceAlonzo Fyfehttp://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-16594468.post-1131303385762682562005-11-06T11:56:00.000-07:002005-11-06T11:56:00.000-07:00Actually, I made no claim that it would. My object...Actually, I made no claim that it would. My objection was against those who provide only half of the equation and, then claim that this proves their position.<BR/><BR/>Also, note that certain communities will benefit by lower prices in other communities. As the price of certain items drop, people can buy more things. The city that produces the things that Wal-Mart sells will gain jobs to meet the higher demand for whatever they produce.<BR/><BR/>I am not claiming that I know what the overall effects are. I am claiming that those who use these arguments do not know what the final answer is either. The problem is that those who use these faulty arguments do not seem to care that they are faulty. If they did, they would not use them.Alonzo Fyfehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05687777216426347054noreply@blogger.com